79 comments

Thanks a lot for the kind words — we’re really glad you’re enjoying the submarine models.

Just to clarify the geometry in more precise terms: on the Ohio-class bow sections, the mating faces between the top and bottom hull parts include the lip-and-groove alignment details. These are intentional and help the two halves register accurately during assembly. In contrast, the side faces between consecutive hull sections (following hull numbers) are flat, as those are meant to be butt-joined to each other.

The forward hull parts are designed to be printed with the bow pointing upward. In that orientation, the correct faces sit on the print bed and bed adhesion should not be an issue. To make this clearer, we’ve added a new image to the model gallery showing these exact parts sliced and positioned on the print bed in PrusaSlicer, ready to print.

This model has been printed numerous times already in its current form. If you’re instead referring to the free one-piece preview model, we also checked that version and did not find any height or flatness issues on the bow. Still, if you’d like to try an alternative, the Ohio-class page on www.endtas.com
includes a higher-poly version of the same model, which may be preferable depending on your workflow.

If the issue you’re encountering is different from what we’ve described, feel free to send a bit more detail or a slicer screenshot — we’ll be happy to help and look into it further.

Endtas team.

Thank you very much for your kind words, and for sharing that personal connection — it truly means a lot to us. Knowing that this model relates to your grandfather and the Scorpion’s eternal patrol gives the project a much deeper significance.
We’ve accepted your offer, and the files are now available to you. We hope the model brings both enjoyment and a meaningful way to honor her crew. If you have any questions during printing or assembly, or need any specific help along the way, please don’t hesitate to reach out.
We’d also be honored to see your build if you choose to share it when completed.
Endtas team.

Hello,
At the moment, we don’t offer the sail as a standalone purchase. However, the full Ohio class model includes the sail, and it is already split into separate STL parts (sail, fairwater planes, masts, antennas, etc.). This means you’re free to print only the sail assembly if that’s all you need.
All parts are modular and provided individually within the full pack. As always, we recommend checking the renderings and previews to make sure the detail level suits your project before purchasing.
If you need specific information or have a particular application in mind, we’re ready to help.
Endtas team.

Here is our ohio model https://cults3d.com/en/3d-model/game/ohio-class-submarine-hobiadami

Hello,

Thank you very much for the kind words and for following our work so closely — that really means a lot to us. We’re genuinely happy to hear that our submarine models left such a strong impression.

Aircraft carriers and Arleigh Burke–class destroyers are certainly fascinating subjects, but they have already been modeled in great detail by several very capable designers. We generally prefer not to redo work that is already well covered, and instead focus on less explored vessels where we feel we can add something new and distinctive.

We also approach this primarily as a passion project rather than a commercial one. Very large and highly detailed ships like carriers quickly turn into extremely long, demanding projects that move far beyond the “hobby” zone, and in practice the sales never justify that level of effort. For us, keeping the process enjoyable and creatively rewarding is important.

That said, we truly appreciate your enthusiasm and support, and it’s feedback like this that keeps us motivated to keep exploring interesting and uncommon subjects.

Endtas team.

how is this? https://cults3d.com/en/3d-model/game/french-triomphant-class-submarine-1-144-scale-3d-model

Thank you very much for your kind words and for downloading the Edmund Fitzgerald—it’s great to hear that you already have it under construction. I truly appreciate both your support and the time you took to share such a thoughtful suggestion.

You’re absolutely right about traditional scales. Many ship modelers prefer to stay within a consistent scale for display and RC compatibility, and your points about 1:72, 1:96, 1:200, and 1:350 are well taken. I generally design with flexibility in mind so builders can scale in the slicer, but offering clearly defined “standard scale” versions is something I’m actively considering, especially as the catalogue grows.

I’m also glad you mentioned the subject choices. Exploring vessels that are overlooked by large commercial manufacturers is very much intentional, and feedback like yours helps guide how I refine both the models and how they’re presented.

Thanks again for the encouragement and for the constructive advice—it’s genuinely valuable. I wish you an enjoyable build, and I’d love to see photos of your Edmund Fitzgerald as it comes together.

Best regards,

I was looking at the version of the Edmund Edmund Fitzgerald that I downloaded, and then I was looking my download records in Cults, and couldn't find it. I've discovered that I downloaded the free version that you have on Thingiverse. Are there significant differences between the files here versus there? If there are significant improvements on the newer version here, I'm certainly willing to pay for the new version. The biggest problem I'm having is getting the curved bulkhead railing with the ship's name on hull section #9 to print cleanly. I'm trying it on my new printer (a Bambu P2S) right now to see if I can get a good print. if not, I might try to clip off the rail as a separate file and print it on my resin printer to get a nice smooth curve and crisp lettering.

I have now finished printing the parts for the EF in the new set of files, and I must say the difference is amazing when compared to the original free version! My enthusiasm for the Edmund Fitzgerald is mainly tied to the Gordon Lightfoot song, as it came out just about the time I was beginning to have an interest in music as a young man. My main interest in ships are those with reciprocating steam engines. Have you considered doing a tall-stacked tugboat or a Liberty ship from WW II?

That’s wonderful to hear — thank you for taking the time to share this with us. We’re really glad the new file set made such a noticeable difference and that it helped renew your enthusiasm for the Edmund Fitzgerald. Gordon Lightfoot’s song has that same effect on many of us; it’s remarkable how closely music and ships can intertwine with early memories.

Reciprocating steam–era vessels are very close to our hearts as well. Tall-stacked tugboats and Liberty ships are fantastic subjects, but they have already been modeled quite extensively by very capable designers. As a small team working primarily for the enjoyment of the craft, we tend to focus on vessels that are less explored, where we can add something genuinely new rather than re-doing an already well-covered classic.

That said, we always enjoy hearing what resonates with fellow builders, especially those who appreciate steam machinery and its character. Please keep sharing your thoughts and build progress — it genuinely helps guide where we head next.

Endtas team.

Hello,
Thank you very much for the kind words — we’re glad you like the Type IX, it’s a beautiful and iconic boat indeed.
We actually have two different Type IX models, designed for different purposes:
Display model
Length: approx. 21 cm
Intended as a compact desk/display piece
Best suited for static builds rather than RC
Large-scale / RC-friendly model
Length: approx. 1 meter
Designed with thicker hull walls, reinforced details, and simpler geometry to better support RC conversion, internal hardware, and handling
This is the version most builders choose for RC projects
Regarding scale:
A 1 m Type IX corresponds roughly to 1:48 scale, which is exactly the scale you mentioned and a very popular choice for RC submarines.
This makes the larger model a very good starting point for radio control work.
If your goal is RC, the 1 m version is definitely the right one to look at. Builders typically scale slightly up or down depending on their internal layout needs, but 1:48 is right in the sweet spot.
We’d love to see your build take shape — and if you go ahead with it, please consider sharing your progress once completed.
Best regards,
Hobiadami

Hello, you can send us emails on contact2020@endtas.com.

Hello,

Thank you again for your detailed feedback and for your positive comments on the Virginia Class models and the recent hull updates.

Following your message, we revisited the front missile silo hatch area and have now updated the shaft holes. The holes in the missile hatches are currently modeled using the exact same tools and workflow that were used to create the corresponding holes in the hull. As a result, both features are now geometrically consistent, and we expect this to eliminate any potential mismatch between the hatch and hull bores.

Due to the inherent complexity of the geometry in this area, the bores are still not perfectly cylindrical along their entire length; however, they are intended to function with flexible shaft solutions such as thin wire, and the shaft entry points remain accessible from inside the hull for easier installation.

We hope this update resolves the issue you experienced. Please let us know if you encounter any further difficulties or have additional questions after testing the revised files.

Best regards,

Again, you guys rock. Your service is exceptional!!

Hello Bill,

Thank you very much for reaching out, and especially for sharing that you served aboard HMS Superb. First-hand experience on a Swiftsure-class submarine carries a level of insight and authenticity that no plan set or reference book can truly replace, and we genuinely value that.

A Swiftsure-class SSN is a compelling subject, but it is not currently on our fixed development roadmap. That said, projects connected to real service histories are exactly the kind of cases where a commissioned model can make strong sense. Having input from someone who actually lived and worked on the vessel can significantly improve the accuracy, proportions, and overall character of the model.

If you would be interested in commissioning such a project—whether focused specifically on Superb, a particular era, or a preferred scale—we would be happy to discuss scope, references, and feasibility with you in more detail.

Thank you again for your service and for getting in touch. We would be glad to continue the conversation.

Kind regards,
Hobiadami
Endtas

Hello, and thank you very much for your interest.

Our tugboat models are not all the same size; depending on the specific vessel, the overall model length typically ranges between 65 cm and 100 cm. Because of this, the effective scale varies from model to model, based on the real-world length of the vessel it represents.

If you can let us know which specific tugboat model you are referring to, we can give you a much more precise scale reference for that particular design.

Thank you again for your interest—we’ll be happy to clarify further once we know the exact model.

hi thanks for reply its the future class offshore 100cm . like the kit so far ,have most level 1 hull done just waiting on bow thrusters .

Hello, thank you for your interest.

For the Future-class offshore tug, the model is designed to be approximately 1 meter in length, which corresponds to a scale of about 1:89 based on the real vessel’s length. We frequently work around the 1-meter class to keep our models compatible with common exhibitions, RC standards, and display formats. Because of this, our models may have different scales rather than a single fixed one.

The model can easily be resized to any scale by uniformly scaling all parts before printing.

Scaling formula:

Scaling factor = Current scale / Desired scale
Scaling percentage = (Current scale / Desired scale) x 100

Examples:

If the model is currently 1:89 and you want 1:100
Scaling factor = 89 / 100 = 0.89
Scale the model to 89%

If you want 1:72
Scaling factor = 89 / 72 = 1.236
Scale the model to 124%

This method preserves all proportions and works reliably across all parts.

We wish you the best of luck with your build, and we would be delighted if you could share your completed model by adding your build once it is finished.
Best regards

hi again, trying to make it full alps striker by changing deck items , the real striker has diff satellite and gps mast , is it possible to do me designs . i have pictures

Hello. Sure yes send us the images please.

hi how do i send images on here ,thanks

https://ibb.co/RttKHyX

the section circled can u do that for me , also maybe lifeboats and cranes that match alps striker

https://ibb.co/1tdw4r65
https://ibb.co/Sw29hmHS
https://ibb.co/6JwLJ5JR
https://ibb.co/hRj9K07F

noticed left and right life boats diff or one lifeboat and one a launch dinghy ,let me know what think

https://ibb.co/RksP9zgr don't know what model this is but its what trying to achieve apls future class

Hello,

Thank you for sending the image — that helps clarify your request a lot.

To be fully transparent: the section you have circled is not a small accessory addition. It represents a substantial redesign of the roof superstructure, including masts, radar platforms, railings, and related layout changes. This would effectively result in a new variant of the model rather than a simple add-on.

When you first mentioned accessories, we understood the request as smaller, standalone items (such as a simple radar unit or so). What you are now pointing to would require significant redesign work, printability checks, and rebalancing of part count and assembly logic.

That said, we are open to doing this in a structured way. There are two realistic paths forward:

• Commissioned expansion / variant
We can design a Striker-inspired roof structure along with matching lifeboats and cranes as a dedicated add-on set. For a scope of this size, the commissioning cost would typically be in the range of €500–€700, depending on the final level of detail and how closely it follows the reference. All rights would remain with us, and the files would later be released as part of our catalog, while you would of course be free to use them for your personal build.

• Future general update
Alternatively, this could be considered for a broader future revision of the model, but this would be on our internal schedule and without a fixed timeline.

Please let us know which direction you had in mind. If you are considering a commission, feel free to outline how close you would like it to match the reference and whether you want the accessories as separate printable modules or integrated parts.

Thank you again for the reference image and for your continued interest in the Future Class model.

Best regards,
Endtas

Hello,
The Scorpène model is designed to be assembled in a straightforward, modular way, without requiring detailed construction plans.
Assembly is primarily guided by part names, part numbering, and exploded views included in the file set:
Hull sections are split longitudinally and/or transversely. Front (bow) parts have lower numbers, and the numbering increases toward the stern. This makes sequencing intuitive.
Matching parts share consistent naming (e.g., left/right, upper/lower), so corresponding pieces are easy to identify.
Exploded views show the relative position and order of major components and are intended to be used as the main assembly reference.
Parts are designed to be dry-fit first, then glued. Standard CA glue or epoxy works well depending on scale and material.
Internal features such as motor mounts, battery trays, and servo locations (if included in your version) are already positioned in the correct alignment and should be installed before fully closing the hull.
Control surfaces (rudder, planes) are installed last, after the hull is fully bonded and aligned.
The model does not rely on complex hidden joinery; alignment is achieved through geometry, part symmetry, and naming consistency rather than detailed step-by-step instructions.
Best regards,
Hobiadami

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out and for your interest in our Canopus-class pre-dreadnought model. The Thunder Child is an iconic subject, and your project sounds genuinely interesting.

We do review requests like this on a case-by-case basis, particularly when our models are intended to be used in visual media such as a fan film. To better understand the scope and context of your project, it would be helpful if you could share a bit more information—such as links to any previous films or projects you have worked on, a YouTube or Vimeo channel, or any other relevant media presence, if available. This allows us to understand the production style, presentation, and how the model would be used and credited.

Once we have that context, we can more accurately assess whether and how the model could be made available for your project, and under what conditions.

Thank you again for considering our work, and we look forward to hearing more about your project.

Best regards,

As of the film, nothing is public as of now but I do have posters and scene concepts https://i.imgur.com/de4pspR.jpeg https://i.imgur.com/NCfvlAx.png https://i.imgur.com/raU7D5b.jpeg

Hello,

Thank you for sharing the posters and scene concepts.

To better understand your background, could you also share any previously completed projects (films, animations, VFX work, etc.), if available? This helps us assess requests like this more clearly.

Thank you for your interest, and we look forward to your response.

Best regards,

As of, I don't really have a background in the industry but I do have animations that I have made in the past (private). As I try to keep some privacy on what I do on my free time and or just to keep the film private until I have estimate for the release date.

Hello,

Thank you for the clarification and for explaining your situation. We fully understand the wish to keep a project private, especially in its early stages, and we respect that.

At the same time, when our models are requested for use in visual media projects, we do need some form of prior work or completed reference to better understand how the assets would be used and presented. This does not need to be public or widely shared, but some finished examples help us make an informed decision.

If that is not possible at this stage, that is completely understandable. In that case, we would suggest revisiting this conversation once the project is a bit further along or when sharing past work becomes more comfortable for you.

Thank you again for your interest in our Canopus-class model, and we wish you the best of luck with your film project.

Best regards,

https://i.imgur.com/LcKy1AI.mp4

https://i.imgur.com/nErPt24.mp4

https://i.imgur.com/j44qKMG.mp4

Thank you for reaching out and for the detailed description of your idea. We appreciate the interest and the confidence in our work.

Projects of the scale and functional scope you describe—particularly autonomous operation, long-range travel, payload carrying, and internal systems integration—go well beyond what we can responsibly offer as a commissioned design. These types of platforms typically require multidisciplinary engineering, extensive testing, regulatory consideration, and close collaboration with an institution or a dedicated engineering team rather than a single designer or small studio.

For that reason, finding positive grounds for sharing designs, costing, or undertaking development work in this area is unfortunately quite challenging for us. We generally keep our work focused on static models, RC-capable hobby platforms, and clearly non-autonomous, non-operational designs.

That said, we do wish you success with your project and would recommend approaching a university marine robotics lab, a professional engineering consultancy, or an established AUV development group, as they would be better positioned to evaluate feasibility and safety in a structured manner.

Thank you again for your interest and understanding.

Hello,

Thank you very much for your message and for your interest in further developing the Edmund Fitzgerald model.

Regarding your request: sharing our native CAD files is something we approach with a lot of caution. In the past, we’ve had several negative experiences when editable source files circulated, so finding a positive and safe ground for releasing them has become quite difficult for us. For this reason, we generally do not provide native files and keep our distribution limited to finalized 3d printable data.

Of course, you are completely free to scale or modify the STL files in SolidWorks as needed for your own personal build, and many users successfully adapt them this way.

Thank you for understanding, and we truly appreciate your support and enthusiasm for our models.

Kind regards,

Starlight glimmer mu little pony

Hello again, and thank you so much for your continued support — we always appreciate hearing from our frequent builders!

About your requests:
• My Little Pony character – Unfortunately we can’t model copyrighted commercial characters. Hasbro enforces strict IP rules, so we avoid creating designs based on protected franchises.
• 2019 Maserati Ghibli – Same situation here: unlike offshore tugs, which we can easily get inspiration, modern car designs are fully copyrighted, so we don’t produce licensed automobile models unless the designs are in the public domain. Still tgere are numerous 3d models available which you can easily find.

Regarding your ALP Future class build and the multicolor printing issue on the Bambu P1S:
When printing translucent colors over a contrasting hull color, some “ghost” infill color can sometimes show through, even with purge-into-infill disabled. A few tips that often help:

1. Increase the wall count of the translucent part (3–4 walls often makes the color much cleaner).

2. Set the translucent deck layers to 100% infill for the first few millimeters. This prevents dark color bleeding from the infill.

3. Try switching the translucent part to a separate object color group in Bambu Studio to force a slightly larger purge between those two colors.

4. If the issue persists, sometimes printing the translucent parts separately and assembling later gives the cleanest results.

For the Skandi / Future-class variations:
The Skandi ships indeed have different cranes, bow shapes, and bridge outlines compared to the ALP Future. Adjusting the model to match those differences would require a full redesign of the superstructure and forward hull — essentially a separate model. If we tackle the Skandi class as a standalone project in the future, we will certainly incorporate those details.

About a more detailed bridge console for lighting:
This is doable as a small addon. A simplified light-able console could be added without changing the main structure. We can place it on our update list so that future builders (including you) can add tiny LEDs or fiber optics if they wish.

Thanks again for your message — we’re genuinely happy that you enjoy building our designs. And please feel free to share photos of your ALP Future build; we always love seeing what our experienced builders create!

Hello,

Thank you very much for your message and for your kind words — I’m really glad you like our model ships!

By the way, we have already modeled the USS Olympia C-6 as a 1-meter-long, fully 3D-printable model. I’m not sure if you’ve seen that one yet, but it might be of interest since it’s from a similar era and style of historical naval design.

As for the USS Maine and various Civil War ironclads, they are definitely on our long-term idea list, and we’re always open to exploring more ships from that period. I’d be happy to hear any additional ideas you’d like to share — suggestions from builders often help guide future projects.

And thank you for planning to build our Edmund Fitzgerald model; I hope you enjoy it! If you'd like, feel free to share photos of your build when it's complete.

Best regards!

Just a quick addition to my previous reply — I forgot to mention that we’ve also already modeled the CSS Neuse as a detailed, fully 3D-printable kit. Since you’re interested in Civil War ironclads, that one might be worth a look as well.

Thanks again for your interest, and I’m always happy to hear more of your ideas!

Thanks man I hope to make RC models as well!😁

Hi, thank you very much for your purchase!

For the Rotor Tug, all parts follow our standard part-numbering scheme. Name of each file has the information of what it is and where it's located.The numbering starts from the front of the vessel, so front sections use lower numbers, and the numbers increase toward the stern. This makes it easy to understand the build order. Combined with the included exploded views, the model assembles quite intuitively, even for a first project.

For printing, you can start with the common settings used for all our boat models:
• Layer height: 0.16–0.20 mm
• Infill: ~10–15%
• Walls: 2–3
• Supports: only where needed
• Material: PLA works well

Enjoy the build!

thankyou very much for the information im also going to buy the ah-12 when i get payed next month too

Thank you very much for your message — and absolutely no need to apologize. Your attention to detail is genuinely helpful.

You are correct: the second set of propellers (the 5-blade versions) was unintentionally left out during the last file update. That was an oversight on our side. We’ve now restored those files to the package, and a notification has been sent to all previous downloaders so they can access the complete set again.

Thank you as well for your kind words about the model quality — it means a lot. If you notice anything else or have suggestions, please feel free to reach out anytime. Enjoy the build!

Thank you again, its a really good build and already planning to buy another one of your files

Hello,
Thank you very much for your interest in our Edmund Fitzgerald model.

If you’re looking for a simplified “ship-only” version, we actually offer a free edition here:
https://cults3d.com/en/3d-model/various/ss-edmund-fitzgerald-hobiadami

This model shows the Fitzgerald sailing on the Great Lakes and may be just what you need if you prefer a cleaner, standalone display without the full detailed parts pack.

Of course, the premium pack includes the full, highly detailed multipart model along with the newly added ship’s bell files — but you are free to choose whichever suits your project best.

If you have any questions about the differences or need guidance, we’re happy to help anytime.

Hi Ryan!

The Edmund Fitzgerald is legendary, and our 3D-printable model is the perfect starting point for your RC conversion. Its empty hull with numerous access hatches and removable superstructure gives you full flexibility for battery, motor, servo, and ESC installation, while the rudder and propeller are fully functional.

With accurate detail, easy assembly, and total customization freedom, this model lets you bring your RC Fitzgerald to life faster and more smoothly than starting from scratch. Don’t miss the chance to make this iconic ship yours!

Best regards,

Hello, and thank you for your message — and also for your service as a submariner.

At the moment, our submarine models are offered for personal use only, and commercial redistribution (selling prints or digital files) isn’t included in the standard license. However, we do offer custom commercial licenses on a case-by-case basis for people who want to legally sell 3D-printed versions of our models.

If you are interested, please send us a short message describing which submarine model(s) you’d like to produce and approximately how many printed units you expect you and your friends might need. The link you provided sends us to the cults3d main page. After that, we can provide a clear approval path and the appropriate licensing arrangement.

Feel free to contact us anytime — we’ll be happy to help you get set up properly.

Thanks for the prompt response and kind words. Is there a direct email address i can send my enquiry? Sorry if I’ve missed something

you are welcome, you can send an email to us on contact2020@endtas.com

Thank you for your message and for your interest in the Ohio Class Submarine model.

The hull is designed to assemble reliably and strongly, even at over one meter in length. Between the individual hull pieces, the joints are flat butt-joint surfaces to simplify 3D printing and avoid complex geometry that could cause print failure. However, along the horizontal sides of each hull segment, the design includes overlapping joints. When the upper and lower hulls are assembled separately, these overlapping sections allow the top and bottom halves to interlock securely when glued together, providing excellent structural strength.

If interior access is needed, 2 or 3 top-hull pieces can be left unglued and used as removable access lids. Many builders choose this option when adding lighting, RC conversions, or internal reinforcement.

Some builders also reinforce the assembly using fiberglass fabric strips glued inside or rods, though this is optional. The hull walls are approximately 6 mm thick, and even thicker around the missile silo area, which gives you plenty of bonding surface and room to add reinforcing pins if desired.

If you need any additional guidance or suggestions during your build, feel free to contact us anytime—we’re always happy to help.

Thanks

Hello,

Thank you very much for your purchase and for your interest in our Arctic-class model. We truly appreciate your support.

To clarify your questions:

The Arctic-class model is 1 meter in length when fully assembled.

The STL file names are structured to help guide assembly:

Level indicators such as L1, L2, L3 refer to the vertical position of each part.
L1 represents the bottom hull, and the numbering increases as you move upward through the ship.

The numbers at the end of each file name (sometimes with notes like bow, stern, etc.) indicate the part order along the ship’s length.
Smaller numbers are located at the front, while the highest numbers (often “6”) correspond to the stern.

In addition to the main hull and superstructure parts, the model pack includes various deck accessories.
These accessories are optional and can be placed wherever you prefer for your build.
Only a few items have fixed or recommended positions, and those are clearly shown in the renderings.

For more visual guidance, you can find extensive images, explanations, and example layouts here:
https://www.endtas.com/bourbon-arctic-horizon-arctic-support-vessels/

If you have any further questions during assembly, feel free to contact me anytime.
Thank you again for choosing our work — we’re always happy to help.

Kind regards,

Thank u for the Information. Looking forward to built this Kit :-)

Thank you very much! We’re really happy to hear that, and we wish you an enjoyable build. When you complete the model, we would love to see your finished result—please feel free to upload some photos of your build. It’s always inspiring for us and for other builders as well.

If you need anything during the process, just let us know.

Great Service !!!!