194 comments

What model are you talking about buddy?

Hey! Which model are you referring to? I’ll check it on my side.

It is the

Vollkettenaufklärer 38(t) - Kätzchen (APC, Deutschland, WWII, 1944)

“Hey! Which model are you referring to? I’ll check it on my side.”

Hi! Thanks for reaching out and for the kind words, I really appreciate it.

Just to clarify: some of my older models are currently going through updates. As part of that, the main gun parts, the turret, and the hull are being separated, with proper sockets/fitments so the turret can traverse.

So far, the FV510 Warrior, FV4201 Chieftain MK10, Chieftain MK-6, and the Challenger MBT have already received these updates and now come with those parts separated and with matching connectors.

I’ll also check on the possibility of getting the updated/new uploads posted by Saturday and will follow up as soon as I have a confirmation.

Thanks again!

Awesome, Thank you.

Just Added : https://cults3d.com/en/3d-model/game/tracked-rapier-rcm-748-sam-united-kngdom-cold-war-1983

Awesome thank you. I bought the Warrior and Challenger 1 earlier today so I will get those printed over the weekend. The models look great, Its a shame there is no peg on the under side of the turret and corresponding socket in the hull roof but that is a super easy fix I can do on my own so its not an issue really.

My only real feed back so far is that there is a few parts that I think will be too small to print at 1/100th scale. Grills on the engine deck as an example will be lost when printing that small. So those details would bentonite from perhaps being made a little more exaggerated on the smaller versions. But again that's a very minor issue. Over all I think they are awesome and I will be sure to post some picks once I have got them printed.

I will get the, models I have printed and painted and then I will get the tracked rapier and some other models I have my eye on :P

Hello Buddy! It has been updated, any other problems please let me know, I'll fix it as soon as i can.

The cover images are CG renders, not photos of printed models.

I’ll review and fix it today and get back to you with an update.

Hey buddy, it's too low.

Could you give me a discount code? I've bought a model from you before and I'll be buying a few more.

Some models are being updated.

Like, Lynx and PLZ. Their updates will be uploaded tomorrow.

Thanks! I accepted some offers already, but a few were just too low. If you resend a reasonable offer, I’ll review it.

Thanks! I accepted some offers already, but a few were just too low. If you resend a reasonable offer, I’ll review it.

Hi! I accepted some offers, but others were too low. Feel free to send a fair offer and I’ll take a look.

Hi! No problem, I’ll issue a refund for the Volvo XC60. Thanks.

Hi, just wanted to check back in before the blocos start up ahead of carnival :) Is this something you might be able to help with? thanks so much!

Thanks for the details. I don’t do custom ‘split into separate pieces’ versions of files.

Hi! Could you please send me your order number (or the purchase receipt) and the link to the exact model you bought? I’m not finding “F250” under that name in my sales/download history, so I want to make sure I’m looking at the right file before I fix anything.

https://cults3d.com/en/3d-model/various/ford-super-duty-crew-cab-2011-pre-supported

It was this one but idk the order number and weren’t you supposed to give me a refund on that one

I’ve just updated the model on that page. Please download the latest version and check if it’s working properly for you now. If you still see the same issue after updating, tell me what exactly is wrong, and I’ll take another look.

It works but I want it in a low Polly mode we’re I’d doesnt have to slice so long and make the truck bed flat

Hey Griffon

I’ve taken a careful look at the model and spent some time working on it. I corrected the mesh, made it fully solid, and separated some parts so it’s now available both as a single-piece model and as separated parts designed for proper fitting and assembly. This should also address the triangulation and surface issues you mentioned.

The updated files are now available. Please take a look and let me know if this version meets your expectations and feels better to you.

If, after reviewing the updated model, you’re still not satisfied, that’s absolutely fine. Just let me know and I will process the refund without any problem.

Thanks again for your feedback and for giving me the chance to improve the model.

Hey, thank you so much for looking into it!
It looks way better now, i´m very thankfull you spend the time and optimized the model!

I have only one little request if its okay. Could you please seperate the armament of the Turret to make it positionable aswell? There are many pictures showing the moveable parts - that would make this perfect for my and i think many others usecase!

The 2S6 is way to unterrepresented in the modelling community...

Cheers

Usually it’s a single solid part. I design them that way to keep printing simple and sturdy, because apparently gravity and thin walls are still undefeated.

That said, I can separate the wheels and add proper peg/slot fittings if you want, which works much better for things like drift builds. If the model is an older one, I may need to do a full update to reinforce geometry and make it properly solid. That kind of refresh usually takes around 1 to 3 days, depending on how ancient the file is.

Totally doable, just not instant magic.

Hi, thank you for reaching out and explaining the issue. I understand your concern and I’ve already prepared a fix for the model. I released an updated version with adjusted wall thickness so it prints properly on FDM, avoiding the thin features being lost by the slicer, while keeping the details intact. Before moving forward with a refund, could you please let me know if, after this update, you would like to try the corrected version? If you still prefer a refund, no problem at all, I’ll take care of it right away.

Hey that's fantastic! You've just made it on to my favourites list! Great work. Increasing the wall thickness and separating the wheels seems to have worked great. It sliced fine. I've got a test print on now.
Thanks, it's nice to see a creator who sticks behind there work and sorts issues!
Thank you!

Thank you so much for the kind words, I really appreciate it. Just to give you some context, most of the car models are older releases, and lately I’ve been focusing much more on military models, which is why those follow newer standards by default. That said, if you come across any issues with other car models, feel free to send me a message. I’m more than happy to update them, including separating the wheels and adjusting wall thickness, usually on the same day. Thanks again for the feedback and for giving the updated version a try, it really means a lot.

Hi, thank you for reaching out and explaining the issue. I understand your concern and I’ve already prepared a fix for the model. I released an updated version with adjusted wall thickness so it prints properly on FDM, avoiding the thin features being lost by the slicer, while keeping the details intact. Before moving forward with a refund, could you please let me know if, after this update, you would like to try the corrected version? If you still prefer a refund, no problem at all, I’ll take care of it right away.

also did not realize it is not FDM and not rotating turret

Good Morning!

I’ve already corrected the issues and released an updated version of the model, including a proper 1:56 scale adjustment, separation of the turret as an independent part, and separation of the antennas to make printing and customization easier. The model is now correctly sized and more modular than before. Before proceeding with a refund, could you please let me know if, after this update, you still wish to receive the refund? If you prefer the refund, I’ll take care of it right away; otherwise, you can simply download and use the upgraded files.

Awesome, I'll hang on to it in that case as long as you anticipate that the model will be able to print FDM. Im traveling currently so unfortunately am not able to test it out.

Hi Sel,

Thank you very much for your message and for choosing my M26 Pershing model. I’m really glad to hear you’re happy with the overall detail.

Regarding the tracks: I made the recess in the hull intentionally a bit shorter/shallower so it acts more as a positioning guide than a tight mechanical joint. The idea was that you’d place the tracks in the correct position and secure them with a small amount of glue, since different printers and resins/filaments can cause dimensional variations and a deeper, tighter “lock” can sometimes end up not fitting properly.

I also kept the connection area smaller to make it easier for the tracks to slide into place under the track guards/side protection without bumping into them. If the peg or recess is too large, it can collide with the protection and make assembly even more difficult.

That said, I can absolutely modify the model and make the recess deeper / the mating surface larger if you prefer. My only concern is just avoiding making the fit so tight that it becomes harder for you to assemble. If you’re comfortable with that, I’ll go ahead and increase the depth/size of the recess and upload an updated version for you at no additional cost.

Could you please confirm that you’d like me to enlarge the recess/connection so I can prepare and add the revised files to your download?

Best Regards
M3D Tech

Hi M3D Tech

Thanks for the reply and detailed explanation. I am thinking that the best solution for me would be a hull and tracks combined and a seperate turret if this is possible. I am sorry to be a pain in the neck. :)
Regards
Sel

The image is literally the model.
Could you please clarify what specific issue you found with the file?

I don't know how to upload pictures, but your drawing is really different from the picture you show. The wiring of the vehicle body has concave and convex parts and is not smooth. The turret is more like a simple model and is not smooth. So the drawing doesn't meet my expectations at all. But the model shown in your picture, I think, is very good, but in reality, it's not like that. There is a big gap

So this model is of no use to me. I have deleted it, so please refund

Your drawing has almost no details and is even less detailed than the free one. So please refund. Thank you

The wheels in your drawing are even more outrageous. There are actually a few screws missing. I don't know why you are selling a semi-finished product with no details and rough texture, while the display pictures of the model are so perfect

I will issue the refund.

Just for clarification: the model is intentionally designed with slightly exaggerated surface features. This is a standard practice for 3D-print optimization, because details that look subtle on-screen often print poorly at small scales. These adjustments are deliberate, not defects.

You also didn’t print the model, so your evaluation is based only on the raw mesh, not the final physical result. Before making strong claims, please consider that communicating respectfully is important. I have no issue refunding, but I do ask that after you print the model in the future, you come back with photos of the physical result. That way we can discuss real-world output rather than assumptions from the 3D viewport.

Refund will be processed.

Thank you for your understanding. I have deleted the file